• About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
Monday, June 16, 2025
MyPublisher24
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Crime
  • Health
  • World News
  • Features & Opinions
  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Crime
  • Health
  • World News
  • Features & Opinions
No Result
View All Result
Morning News
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Supreme Court ruling: This is judicial support for controversial E-levy – Minority

Osumanu Al-Hassan by Osumanu Al-Hassan
March 9, 2022
in News
0
Supreme Court ruling: This is judicial support for controversial E-levy – Minority
0
SHARES
73
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterWhatsapp

The Minority in Parliament has described a Supreme Court ruling relating to a Deputy Speaker being able to vote while presiding as judicial support for the controversial Electronic Transaction Levy (E-levy).

The ruling, according to the Minority, is a tacit interference of the work of Parliament by the apex court.

READ ALSO

Your baby steps today will become professional steps tomorrow- Dr China to UCC students

Constitution is clear, Parliament must ratify – Annoh Dompreh roars over Goldfields-Damang mine lease extension

The Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday, March 9, 2022, that a Deputy Speaker presiding can cast a vote for the House to make a decision and also be counted for plenary for form quorum.

The ruling is, however, contrary to Standing Order 109(3) of Parliament which states, “A Deputy Speaker or any other member presiding shall not retain his original vote while presiding.”

Minority leader, Haruna Iddrisu, who addressed the media in Parliament on the issue argued the ruling amounts to judicial interference on time tested Parliamentary practice and established conventions.

The ruling, he said, means Deputy Speakers should be stripped of their courtesies since the ruling makes them ordinary MPs contrary to what pertains in other jurisdictions including the United Kingdom.

He said, “The presiding officer’s vote is discounted. So it’s not for nothing that Article 102 of the Constitution provides that a person presiding shall have no original nor casting votes.”

“The Supreme Court ruling, to put it aptly, is judicial support for a levy nothing more.”

“This is a judicial support for President Nana Akufo-Addo’s E-levy that he is labouring to pass.”

According to him, the Judiciary of Ghana is also failing Ghana’s Parliamentary democracy in their inability to appreciate the true meaning of Article 110 of the Constitution that Parliament shall, by Standing Orders, regulate its own procedures.

“When we regulate our own procedures and today reference is only made to the 1992 Constitution and not to the Standing Orders of Parliament of Ghana and in particular Standing Order 13,” he added.

The Minority, he said, remains opposed to the E-levy and will fight it stitch by stitch, clause by clause and article by article whenever it is presented to the House.

Source: Mypublisher24.com

Tags: controversialE-levyjudicialMinoritySupreme Court

Related Posts

baby steps
News

Your baby steps today will become professional steps tomorrow- Dr China to UCC students

June 16, 2025
Goldfields-Damang
Main

Constitution is clear, Parliament must ratify – Annoh Dompreh roars over Goldfields-Damang mine lease extension

June 16, 2025
Black Volta
News

Bede Ziedeng: Lawra MP mourns drowning of seven students in Black Volta tragedy

June 16, 2025
Israel- Iran
Main

Mahama fears spiking oil prices amid Israel-Iran conflict

June 16, 2025
sanitation contract
News

YEA sanitation contract ‘expired; not cancelled’ – Zoomlion breaks silence

June 16, 2025
Zoomlion, YEA, contract,
Main

Zoomlion clarifies end of YEA contract

June 15, 2025
Next Post
“Is what women seek for; equity or equality? Breaking the bias, depends on us!” the Ghana story!

“Is what women seek for; equity or equality? Breaking the bias, depends on us!” the Ghana story!

POPULAR NEWS

Lighthouse chapel

Lighthouse Chapel Case: 6 Ex-Pastors Demand $12 Million Settlement

April 30, 2023
aircraft

Light House Brouhaha: Kofi Bentil Exposed Over $12M Settlement Deal

April 24, 2023
SSNIT Exonerates Lighthouse; Six Renegade EX-Pastors Shamed

SSNIT Exonerates Lighthouse; Six Renegade EX-Pastors Shamed

April 24, 2023
Kwaku Azar writes: Until a prima facie case is established

Akufo-Addo Nominates Gertrude Torkornoo As New Chief Justice

June 12, 2025
Lighthouse Brouhaha: Larry Odonkor charged with Stealing

Lighthouse Brouhaha: Larry Odonkor charged with Stealing

April 24, 2023

EDITOR'S PICK

Naa Fuseini Seidu Pelpuo

Wa Naa, Y-PES Ghana launch Youth for Peace Declaration campaign

November 16, 2024
Speaker extol memory of late Nkwanta South MP

Speaker extol memory of late Nkwanta South MP

November 24, 2021
John Dramani Mahama

An Open Letter to John Dramani Mahama from Charles Owusu Juanah, Esq

September 20, 2024
out-performed NDC, small-scale mining, delegates, Vice-President, Youth wing, Dr. Bawumia,

Bawumia swat NDC: The opposition is shackled by mindset of impossibility – he says

June 13, 2023

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Important Links

  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Crime
  • Health
  • World News
  • Features & Opinions

Recent Posts

  • Your baby steps today will become professional steps tomorrow- Dr China to UCC students
  • Constitution is clear, Parliament must ratify – Annoh Dompreh roars over Goldfields-Damang mine lease extension
  • Monday June 16 2025 Newspaper Headlines
  • Bagbin: The Speaker cannot overturn the decision of the House

Archives

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

© 2025 mypublisher24 - All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Crime
  • Health
  • World News
  • Features & Opinions

© 2025 mypublisher24 - All rights reserved.