Former UNDP Diplomat calls for annulment of lithium deal between Ghana and Atlantic Lithium

African Human Development Expert and formerly with the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP),  Dr Ishmael Nii Amanor Dodoo, has called for the annulment of the current lithium mining lease deal between Ghana and Atlantic Lithium.

According to Dr Ishmael Dodoo, the deal does not offer Ghana real value for money.

“The lithium deal is completely out of touch and Ghana should not engage it because it does not give Ghana value for money and also does not position Ghana to participate in the next digital revolution.

“The deal should even be annulled to allow Ghana to reflect on the deal, go back to the drawing board to have a better deal,” he remarked.

Dr Ishmael Dodoo, Executive Vice President of CO2 Capital Africa Development, made the assertions speaking on the NorvanReports’ and Economic Governance Platform (EGP) X Space Discussion on the topic, “Voices from the Ground: Local Perspectives on Lithium Mining In Ghana”.

The mining lease agreement between Ghana and Barari DV Ghana Limited – a subsidiary of Atlantic Lithium – for lithium extraction, is expected to be presented to Parliament for ratification by the first quarter of 2024.

The Lands and Natural Resources Minister, Samuel Jinapor, has emphasized that parliamentary ratification is a prerequisite for the lease, as specified in Clause 1E of the agreement, adding that failure to undergo this process would lead to the annulment of the lease.

The Minister clarified the government’s awareness of the importance of parliamentary approval, stating, “By the very term of the lease, therefore, ratification by Parliament is a condition precedent, as an unratified mining lease confers no enforceable right, and the government has always been mindful of this decision.”

He has assured that the mining lease would be presented to Parliament, aligning with constitutional provisions and legal protocols.

The lithium mining lease, granted for 15 years to Barari, a subsidiary of Atlantic Lithium Limited, an Australian company listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) and the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) of the London Stock Exchange, covers an area of 42.63 km² in and around Ewoyaa in the Mfantseman Municipality of the Central Region.

The $250-million project, located in Ewoyaa, Mfantseman Municipality in the Central Region, is set to commence production by 2025.

The deal includes a 10% royalty and 13% free carried interest by the state, surpassing the existing 5% and 10%, respectively, for other mining agreements.

Barari DV Ghana Limited is also required to contribute 1% of its revenue to a community development fund for the upliftment of the mining area.

Here is a brief summary of what a section of Civil Society thinks and recommends for a better Lithium Mining Agreement

  1. Changing the flat royalties provision in the agreement to a flat + variable royalty, whereby the 10% floor rate in the agreement is buffered by an extra, incremental, royalty layer once the operational margin crosses a certain threshold. In short, the more profitable the operation becomes, the more Ghana must earn.

  2. Add “creative options” to the equity provision for the State such that once the economics of the project attain a certain trajectory, the State would have the right to exercise convertible securities and increase its ownership. In short, after the investors recoup their investment and make a good return, Ghana deserves an additional say in the local company producing the lithium, Barari DV, plus higher dividends.

  3. Addressing the state equity participation issue comprehensively is critical because the current project – Ewoyaa – is only a small fraction, just a little above 7%, of the total acreage licensed to the company directly or through affiliates to search for more lithium and other minerals, even as at least 50% of the lithium to be produced at Ewoyaa has already been committed to an American off-taker. Instructively, 7 other deposits, besides the main Ewoyaa formation, are being primed for development and re-licensing by Ghana (and in some cases for further exploration work). Furthermore, the global horizon for lithium is highly complex and volatile, requiring clever positioning by the State to benefit from any upside and to minimize risks on the downside.

  4. To ensure that the chemical refinery shall be prioritized, the provision in the agreement for a scoping study to be conducted to determine whether Atlantic Lithium shall indeed proceed to do so must be tightened to specify what exactly would be the yardstick of satisfaction Atlantic Lithium shall use to decide whether or not the refinery can be built. Doing this will allow easy and transparent monitoring of the process.

  5. Since the interplay between economics and chemistry is much more complex for lithium than for, say, gold or bauxite, it has been suggested that the types of refining acceptable to the State should be specified to set clear expectations about the actual degree of value addition.

  6. Ghana’s sovereign wealth fund (MIIF) is co-investing alongside the central government through various commercial transactions. Shareholding protections necessary to secure the public interest have not been disclosed. Instead, the public has been treated to a stream of self-congratulatory praise about phantom quantum gains. We have called for this perversion to be corrected.

  7. The fiscal streams expected from the lithium license are not as the country has been told. Further disclosures of extra-contractual engagements between various state entities and the investor is required to determine the full facts. Likewise, planned equity participation must be designed to manage various risks.

Atlantic LithiumGhanaUNDP lithium deal