The witness for the Electoral Commission (EC) in the 2020 election petition (EC), Mrs Jean Mensa, who is also the Chairperson of the EC, will not give any evidence, lawyers for the EC have indicated to the Supreme Court.
Lead counsel for the EC, Mr Justin Amenuvor, told the apex court today that his client, (EC), which is the first respondent has decided not to adduced any evidence and therefore the court should decide the petition filed by Former President John Dramani on its merit.
He premised his argument on Order 36 (4) sub rule 3 of the High Court (Civil Procedure Rule ), C.I 47, which he argued allowed the respondent to decide not to adduce any evidence.
“The case of the first respondent is that we do not wish to adduce any evidence. Our case is closed”, he argued.
Counsel made the submission after the petitioner brought his case to a close following the cross-examination of the third witness for the petitioner, Mr Robert Joseph Mettle-Nunoo.
Mr Tsatsu Tsikata, a lead counsel for the petitioner, opposed the stance taking by the EC’s lawyer.He argued that so far as Mrs Mensa has put in a witness statement, and had indicated that she will testify, she had “elected” to give evidence and by the rules of court, she must give the evidence.It was also the submission of counsel that it was based on the indication by Mrs Mensa to give evidence that led the court to order the parties to file their witness statements.
Jean Mensah with petitioner Mahama
But Justices on the bench such as Justices Gertrude Torkornoo, Nii Ashie Kotey and Samuel Marful-Sau asked Mr Tsikata whether a witness can be forced to give evidence.
The Supreme Court has adjourned the case to tomorrow for the lawyers to address the case on the issue and for the court to make a determination.
Source: Mypublisher24.com
