My deep concern is about the detrimental impact of verbally abusive communication on our public space.
As a citizen of Ghana, I am alarmed by the rising trend of divisive and inflammatory language used by some parliamentarians, which has created a toxic atmosphere in our public discourse.
The effects of such verbal communication are far-reaching, leading to increased polarization, mistrust, and hostility among citizens. This not only undermines the dignity of our Parliament but also erodes the fabric of our society.
In Ghana, the Parliamentary Standing Orders address the issue of bad verbal communication among honorable members. According to the revised Standing Orders of 2024, there are provisions that promote respectful and constructive dialogue among members. Specific Provisions:
– Order 98: Mr. Speaker may order a Member whose conduct is grossly disorderly to withdraw from the Chamber.
– Language of Proceedings: The language of proceedings in Parliament is English, but a Member may speak in any Ghanaian language with the permission of Mr. Speaker.
The revised Standing Orders aim to promote a more respectful and inclusive parliamentary culture. The Speaker of Parliament has emphasized the importance of aligning parliamentary conduct with the evolving needs of Ghana’s democracy.
These provisions demonstrate Ghana’s commitment to promoting respectful dialogue and constructive debate among its parliamentarians.
Ghana’s 1992 Constitution emphasizes the importance of respectful communication, particularly among members of Parliament. While there isn’t a specific provision directly addressing “bad verbal communication,” several articles promote respectful dialogue and protect citizens from abusive language.
Fundamental Human Rights and Freedoms
Articles 12-30 of the Constitution outline fundamental human rights and freedoms, including:
– Protection of Fundamental Human Rights and Freedoms(Article 12): Ensures that the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Constitution are respected and upheld
– Freedom of Speech and Expression(Article 21(1)(a)): Guarantees the right to freedom of speech and expression, including freedom of the press and other media.
Parliamentary Conduct
Although the Constitution doesn’t explicitly address verbal communication among Parliament members, it implies that respectful dialogue is essential for effective governance.
Constitutional Provisions and Court Interpretations
In cases where verbal communication has been deemed abusive or unconstitutional, the courts have intervened. For instance:
– Article 18(2): Protects individuals from unreasonable search and seizure, which has been interpreted to include protection from unwarranted intrusion into private conversations.
– Article 21(1)(d): Guarantees the right to freedom of assembly, which has been interpreted to include the right to peaceful protest and assembly without fear of abusive language or intimidation.
In summary, while the 1992 Constitution doesn’t explicitly address “bad verbal communication” among Parliament members, it promotes respectful dialogue and protects citizens from abusive language through various provisions and court interpretations.
I urge you to take immediate action to address this issue. Specifically, I recommend:
– Promoting Civility and Respect: Encourage parliamentarians to engage in respectful and constructive dialogue, even when disagreeing.
– Establishing Clear Guidelines: Develop and enforce clear guidelines on parliamentary language and behavior to prevent inflammatory and divisive rhetoric.
– Fostering Public Engagement: Create opportunities for citizens to engage with parliamentarians and provide feedback on their concerns and expectations.
To effectively address this issue, I suggest the following:
– Conduct Workshops and Training Sessions: Organize workshops and training sessions for parliamentarians to learn effective communication skills, conflict resolution, and emotional
intelligence.
– Encourage Public Debate and Discourse: Foster a culture of public debate and discourse, encouraging citizens to engage in constructive dialogue on national issues.- Develop a Code of Conduct: Establish a code of conduct for parliamentarians, outlining expectations for respectful language and behavior.
I believe that by working together, we can restore the dignity of our Parliament and promote a more inclusive and respectful public discourse.
Author: Derrick kwaku Antwi (Ph.D)
